<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Особенности Литовского Load Balancing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kurakin.info/load-balancing-in-lithuania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kurakin.info/load-balancing-in-lithuania/</link>
	<description>Sergej Kurakin aka ZaZa - WEB-developer</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Сергей Куракин</title>
		<link>http://kurakin.info/load-balancing-in-lithuania/#comment-17698</link>
		<dc:creator>Сергей Куракин</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kurakin.info/load-balancing-in-lithuania/#comment-17698</guid>
		<description>Good solution in right place.
Static (ok, possibly not always static) images, load balancing done on client side with possible error handling. I think this is best solution, that can be done in this place - static file serving.

But, when you serving main request (when user request dynamically generated content - HTML page) for user you can't trust this solution. When load balancing is done by NGINX (and, as I remember Lighttpd) - if one of servers do not answer in correct time request will be sent to other server - user will get answer any way, because there are mo than 1 server for user, but user don't see them. And when load balancing done with "other subdomain" if this domain fails - user sees nothing.
Also, ServerSide load balancing can be done in Hash mode and in right place with right solution this coud be very effective solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good solution in right place.<br />
Static (ok, possibly not always static) images, load balancing done on client side with possible error handling. I think this is best solution, that can be done in this place - static file serving.</p>
<p>But, when you serving main request (when user request dynamically generated content - HTML page) for user you can&#8217;t trust this solution. When load balancing is done by NGINX (and, as I remember Lighttpd) - if one of servers do not answer in correct time request will be sent to other server - user will get answer any way, because there are mo than 1 server for user, but user don&#8217;t see them. And when load balancing done with &#8220;other subdomain&#8221; if this domain fails - user sees nothing.<br />
Also, ServerSide load balancing can be done in Hash mode and in right place with right solution this coud be very effective solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giedrius</title>
		<link>http://kurakin.info/load-balancing-in-lithuania/#comment-17601</link>
		<dc:creator>Giedrius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kurakin.info/load-balancing-in-lithuania/#comment-17601</guid>
		<description>Try google maps - for images they are using four servers (mt0, mt1, mt2, mt3), all servers have all image titles and if i understood obfocused javascript correctly, image server for each map title is chosed using simple radom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try google maps - for images they are using four servers (mt0, mt1, mt2, mt3), all servers have all image titles and if i understood obfocused javascript correctly, image server for each map title is chosed using simple radom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
